Nemesis Posted March 28, 2009 Report Posted March 28, 2009 http://www.gametrailers.com/player/47330.html Quote
Disciple74 Posted March 29, 2009 Report Posted March 29, 2009 Boy they show you too much of the game play in that video. Quote
IRISH BULL Posted March 29, 2009 Report Posted March 29, 2009 That trailer is about as informative as the new Modern Warfare 2 trailer. Quote
Johnson30 Posted March 29, 2009 Report Posted March 29, 2009 Maybe they will get it right this time Quote
CDBS14 Posted March 30, 2009 Report Posted March 30, 2009 IRISH BULL ]That trailer is about as informative as the new Modern Warfare 2 trailer. actually it was better, im praying this thing is more like battlefield2 than bad company1, i mean they didnt put in any jokes or part of the first bad company in this one..............BUT BATTLEFIELD3 IS WHAT I WANT!!!!!!!!!!!! Quote
Nemesis Posted March 30, 2009 Author Report Posted March 30, 2009 Battlefield Bad Company 2 Ups the Destruction A first-look at Battlefield Bad Company 2's gameplay reveals a lot more destruction, an icy setting and plenty of gun play. Last week, DICE gave a slew of reporters an early look at the gameplay for their upcoming destructive shooter Battlefield Bad Company 2. Senior producer Patrick Bach warned that the gameplay we saw that night was from "quite an early build." The game was developed using the Frostbite engine and features more destruction. in fact destruction 2.0, than the original title, he said. They only showed single player that night, but they plan to show multiplayer at E3. We watched as a developer played through a chunk of the game. The level opened on an undisclosed snowy setting in Alaska, with men running across a frozen lake toward a small village that has been occupied by Russian troops. The player ran through the town, stopping behind cover to take out enemy units until bullets chipped away at his protection and he was forced to move. At one point, the player ran into a house, firing off shots from a window. An enemy with a rocket launcher fired at the developer, missing him but blowing down the wall of the house he was in. As the player moved through the town, some enemy tanks rolled onto the scene and he called in air support. As the bombs exploded, the screen filled with smoke. As it dissipated, you could see the remains of the flattened tanks. Nearby buildings, hit not with the bombs, but still blasted by the concussion, crumble into the road leaving a scene of detailed devastation. After fighting through the town, the developer jumped into the back of a truck to chase down retreating units. The game shifts from shooter to rail shooter as he starting picking off ATVs chasing the truck along the snow-packed road. Occasionally, an attack helicopter zips in and out of sight, firing on the truck. Bach said the game will feature new weapons and new gadgets, but will still work on the basic rock, paper, scissor premise in battle. Quote
IRISH BULL Posted March 31, 2009 Report Posted March 31, 2009 I gotta be honest, I'm looking forward to Battlefield:1943. I like DL versions of games. I'm waiting for SOCOM to be on sale so I have it in my library. Quote
CDBS14 Posted March 31, 2009 Report Posted March 31, 2009 IRISH BULL ]I gotta be honest, I'm looking forward to Battlefield:1943. I like DL versions of games. I'm waiting for SOCOM to be on sale so I have it in my library. dont get it 1943 is like a joke of 1942. its like 12v12 at most compared to the old 64v64. Only 3 or 4 classes which is crazy and like 3 classic maps. Completely sent the franchise backwards instead of forwards. Quote
Chili327 Posted March 31, 2009 Report Posted March 31, 2009 What about 2142, i thought that was the next installment.!? Quote
CDBS14 Posted March 31, 2009 Report Posted March 31, 2009 Chili-Palmer ]What about 2142, i thought that was the next installment.!? lol, it was, back in 06/07, lol Quote
Chili327 Posted March 31, 2009 Report Posted March 31, 2009 What i meant was that 2142 was the sequel to 1942.. not that it was new.. lol I never even heard of 1943. Quote
CDBS14 Posted March 31, 2009 Report Posted March 31, 2009 Chili-Palmer ]What i meant was that 2142 was the sequel to 1942.. not that it was new.. lol I never even heard of 1943. ahhh, BF doesnt really have sequels as there is no story mode. But 1943 is a download, basically a remake of 1942 with team fortress style graphics and the classic maps from BF1942 like wake island. The thing is, that 1943 is a dumbed down version of BF, it shouldnt even have the BF logo on it. Quote
bizzyb0t Posted April 1, 2009 Report Posted April 1, 2009 Oh wait... did I see a prone sniper? One of my biggest gripes with BF:BC was the lack of prone. I liked the first installment, along with the lack of prone, I hated the "squad only" chat and the random squads. More clan support and a better voice chat system are needed. I won't be pre-ordering BF:BC2 though. Quote
CDBS14 Posted April 1, 2009 Report Posted April 1, 2009 bizzyb0t ]Oh wait... did I see a prone sniper? One of my biggest gripes with BF:BC was the lack of prone. I liked the first installment, along with the lack of prone, I hated the "squad only" chat and the random squads. More clan support and a better voice chat system are needed. I won't be pre-ordering BF:BC2 though. see BF2 and 2142 had great squad support and chat options. IDK why DICE messed up so ba don bad company. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.