Sorry I need another clarification. Tonight we just had a war with [101] 101st Screaming Eagles. Which by the way was a great match.
Tonight, we played our Scheduled UFGL ladder match on the SOCOM Team Ladder but we came to some confusion. We won the first map, Urban Wasteland Large Control 4-2. After that we played Uprising Large Breach, which 101 won 5-0. At this point 101 thought that they had won the war because they had won more rounds at the end of 2 maps believing that these wars were decided in a similar fashion to the wars played in a tournament such as Urgent Fury Black. But we pointed out that in the rules on the UFGL ladder, which can be read at this URL: http://gaming.urgentfury.com/rules.php?rules[ladderid]=17 It says as the #1 rule, "1. Best of 3 maps played."
After bringing this to 101's attention they showed their confusion on the matter, but agreed to play the tiebreaker map which was Vigilance Demolition.
cKs ended up winning Vigilance 3-2.
Understandably after the match 101 felt that they wanted some clarification on the rules and said they will dispute the result of the war. Which honestly I can completely understand because the rules can be interpreted differently here.
Like I said before, it was a great match. cKs has had many wars with 101 and all of them have been phenomenal. The very last thing we would want is to cause any sort of trouble between our two clans. But the matter stands that cKs feels that they have won the war since we won 2 of the 3 maps played, while 101 feels that they deserved the win after the 2nd map.
All I would like is some clarification on the matter please. Thank you.