New Sig

[Guest MainEvent]

You guys like it ?

[Guest NEO-X]

I think its sexy

[RNG187]

yeah man, it looks good

[Guest MainEvent]

Thanks guys!

[Red0ctobeR]

It is sweet but the animation needs to be smoother. Maybe add more frames slow it down a little. And let the whole image slide through before you end the tween. That way it won't look like it starts over, merely keeps the effect looking good.

[Guest NEO-X]

Yeah the animation could be smoother....

 

I suck at ani's.. infact Ive only made one....

 

 

 

 

If anyone knows Why_u_die .. he's a beast at making animated sigs..

[Pathogen-]

i used to do them, but the style got old and "sooo 2 years ago"

[Guest NEO-X]

I just think it limits what u can do otherwise in terms of color, and clarity. since gifs are so damn lossy

[Guest MainEvent]

Yeah that's very true, I hate making sigs in GIF format just because it looks horrible. I actually had added that effect and then I was moving it around the sig trying to find out where to place and I noticed how cool it looked just moving all around. I never do animation sigs so yeah the animation kind of sucks but thanks for the tips october and thanks for comments everyone. K I'm done posting for the day, Time to get drunk!!..

[UNCLE-SID25]

Damn that is cool... I still cant figure out how to get the transparency to go away... When I use certain web surfers I see nothing (it is transparent) but when I use Internet explorer I see white at the top... I have saved in every format known to man. :-\

 

[Guest MainEvent]

You have to save as .png

[UNCLE-SID25]

I do.

[Deutscher75]

UNCLE-SID25 ]

I do.

 

it's Microsoft...Bill Gates sucks dick...

[Guest Stealthknight]

UNCLE-SID25 ]

 

 

this image looks fine, and i use mozilla. not sure where your seeing a white box

[BIGDANIEL]

UNCLE-SID -

 

I have had the same problem for the past 6 months and I use IE as well. I've been told to download everything from JAVA to the new IE and nothing has helped.

 

I've found 2 things to be true in all of this though: 1.) Mozilla does help (although I'm not a Mozilla fan) and 2. IE 7.0 doesnt (or anything else I was told to download)

 

I personally use IE 7.0. I've grown used to seeing the white backgrounds so its not a big concern for me anymore.

[banshee07]

im on ie 7 and i see it fine.

[Pathogen-]

just use Mozilla lol It is better anyway. IE is a useless icon on my desktop

[BIGDANIEL]

Banshee07 ]

im on ie 7 and i see it fine.

 

 

Must be nice.

 

 

I had thought that it might be .png vs .gif but I can see Pathogen's sig just fine but see a white background on the sigs of Solja and SID and all three are .png.

 

So maybe its the way they were created?

 

 

 

[Pathogen-]

that is because my sig isn't a pop-out...theirs is

[Pathogen-]

that is because my sig isn't a pop-out...theirs is.   I stopped doing pop-outs back in the day when they got over-done, but I see like mulletts, they are making a comback lol  ;D

I wish I had a mullett.

This post totally didnt make sense, but I'm hung over and rambling.  So, to sum up, if a sig is a pop out, it usually looks bad in internet explorer.

Use mozilla!

[Guest Stealthknight]

I didnt like mozilla at first but I use it just fine now. It is much more stable the IE 7 from my experience. But Path is right, Mine and Sids sigs are pop out which means the have transparent backgrounds. For some reason certain users have trouble with viewing them and it puts a white box filling the entire boundry where the sig is

[RNG187]

i'm on vista, and the latest IE, and both your sigs look great, what white box?

[BIGDANIEL]

RNG187 ]

i'm on vista' date=' and the latest IE, and both your sigs look great, what white box?

[/quote']

 

 

 

This remnds me of the time they told me they couldn't hear the voices in my head. ;D

[RNG187]

u hear them too? HA! im not crazy. :P

[BIGDANIEL]

I see white boxes.  I know I do.  Right??