o-BacklasH-o
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Articles
Events
Blogs
Everything posted by o-BacklasH-o
-
Socom (Socrack) 1 and 2 were fun as hell and addicting, I used to love to play those for hours upon hours upon hours . I can't bring myself to play 3 or CA again, sure I had fun on 3 and CA for 2 years, but just like Sid said wow the hit detection stinks. That video did make me crave some Socom though, awesome job!
-
LMAO nice find, absolutely hilarious!
-
-
UF2 was also on those forums.
-
That's hilarious, nice find!
-
He means Sunday lol .
-
Confrontation news likely to be announced late February
o-BacklasH-o replied to o-BacklasH-o's topic in Playstation
Yes we'd be playing another Socom like 3 and CA aka an unfinished and poorly developed game. I am willing to wait as long as it takes if Confrontation brings Socom back to the greatness it was it in Socom 1 and 2. -
Confrontation news likely to be announced late February
o-BacklasH-o replied to o-BacklasH-o's topic in Playstation
lol that is Red's pet peeve . -
Confrontation news likely to be announced late February
o-BacklasH-o replied to o-BacklasH-o's topic in Playstation
Indeed. -
This is a post from one of their Devs on the playstation.com forums:
-
Street is going to have a conniption fit when he sees these results lol.
-
This thread made me take a look at our forums and I have 52d 12h 3m logged in .
-
Probably just a rock that looks similar to a human type figure.
-
LOL The Ravens need a QB plain and simple. McGahee is a beast, but defenses will key on the run and he'll be significantly less effective because the Ravens passing game is so shitty.
-
I doubt Warner Bros. would hold it back. It's done and in the can. It'll be out. They will definitely still release the film from what I'm hearing.
-
Help me figure out what this sig needs
o-BacklasH-o replied to o-BacklasH-o's topic in All-Platform Sig Request Section
Nice, thanks Neo. My internet was down for the entire evening yesterday, so I didn't get to do any work on my sig. I'll probably have the finished product by tomorrow. -
Recorded as in that clan will take note of the infraction, not physically recorded .
-
that's what she said!! LOL poor Havoc.
-
Click on the picture to enlarge it .
-
That is just moronic and I'd be shocked if they didn't get electrocuted (If the wires are actually plugged in).
-
Please note the following change to UF: Black IV rule set 8-D: D: If a clan uses any banned weapon in UF:Black AND obtains a kill by that banned weapon's use, they automatically forfeit the ENTIRE war in which the use of the banned weapon occurred. Repeated abuse of this rule will result in that clans removal from UF:Black. The above text has been removed and replaced with the following: D: If a clan uses any banned weapon in UF: Black AND obtains a kill by that banned weapon's use, the infraction will be recorded by the opposing clan and the map is to play on AS IS. The clan in violation of this rule will forfeit all of their round(s) won for THAT map and the opposing clan will be awarded the victory for that map with their respective round(s) won intact. The following map is to be played normally and both teams' rounds won/lost will be recorded. If the map where the infraction took place was the second map in the war and there were no violations of this rule in the first map, the first map score remains AS IS and only the second map score is affected. The final score will still be determined by overall rounds won. Repeated abuse of this rule will result in that clans removal from UF:Black.
-
Please make note of the following changes of UF Crucible rule set 8-A: > As with the evaluation tourney of SOCOM in the UF: BLACK tourneys, the use of ALL EXPLOSIVES is banned from this small, 4-week tourney. All claymores, mines, grenades, rockets, grenade launchers and any other similar explosive device CANNOT be used in this tourney. All flash, smoke and stun grenades, however, CAN BE USED. Any infraction of this rule WILL result in the offending clan losing that map entirely. As a courtesy and as insurance for a good war, both teams should remind all players that this is a no-bomb tourney. All explosives are saved for the CoD4 tacmap tourneys. The underlined text above has been removed and has been replaced with the underlined text below: > As with the evaluation tourney of SOCOM in the UF: BLACK tourneys, the use of ALL EXPLOSIVES is banned from this small, 4-week tourney. All claymores, mines, grenades, rockets, grenade launchers and any other similar explosive device CANNOT be used in this tourney. All flash, smoke and stun grenades, however, CAN BE USED. If a clan registers a kill with a banned explosive that infraction will be recorded by the opposing clan and the map will play on AS IS. The clan in violation of this rule will forfeit all of their points for THAT map and the opposing clan will be awarded the victory for that map with their respective score intact. The following map is to be played normally and both teams' points will be recorded. If the map where the infraction took place was the second map in the war and there were no violations of this rule in the first map, the first map score remains AS IS and only the second map score is affected. The final score will still be determined by overall points. As a courtesy and as insurance for a good war, both teams should remind all players that this is a no-bomb tourney. All explosives are saved for the CoD4 tacmap tourneys.
-
Help me figure out what this sig needs
o-BacklasH-o replied to o-BacklasH-o's topic in All-Platform Sig Request Section
:'( It says smokeosama so it already has that player that isn't a scrub lol. Just wait until we shoot it up tomorrow Hanni, that's going to cost a teamkill for sure . -
-
I hope a fun time was had by all during the opener!