CritiKiL
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Articles
Events
Blogs
Everything posted by CritiKiL
-
damn guess i got to deal with this jackass everywhere i look now......should get a diff sig......fag and i hope they get of the rank and just keep track of all stats...rank dont mean shit STREETSWEEPER1: I understand that this sig may offend you. I actually just did not get around to changing it. But this post you just made is not flying with me. I really think that you should apologize for the words you chose above. You could have just PM'd me to remove it or something! I have alot of respect for those who have been here before me. But when you had the 'McCain' under 'your' sig...I said nothing. You owe me an opology, and if I do not get one publically...then I guess we'll know from this point on where you and I stand. I've given you ALL respect. Now I'm asking for a little of it back... BTW: Everyone is entitled to their choices. Don't crush on me, because the world chose Obama. Leave me OUT of your fucking politics.
-
I am not 100% sure, but wasn't /6 saying something about adding in the Trophy thing...and that ranks would somehow be reset when this is done? Just mentioning another possibility of the inevitable. I 'know' that it was mentioned that this would be part of the upcoming 1.30 patch, but with /6...'you just never know!' lol
-
Yea, McDyess said 'screw that!', being a Free Agent now...he's staying with Denver: "The Nuggets acquired point guard Chauncey Billups, forward Antonio McDyess and center Cheikh Samb from the Pistons on Monday in exchange for Iverson. Although there's speculation that the Nuggets will buy out McDyess' contract, Rex Chapman, the team's vice president of player personnel, said McDyess is staying." The 'speculation', is now a FACT. This is still 'new', so don't expect it to be on the internet 'just yet'...as I've got 'connections!' lol
-
Check your PM.
-
Today (this morning), on ESPN2HD. It is NOW Official news, but here are some other Online sources though: REFERENCE(S): http://www.faniq.com/blog/Allen-Iverson-Traded-To-Detroit-Pistons-Chauncey-Billups-And-Antonio-McDyess-To-The-Denver-Nuggets-Blog-13481
-
That's right! Allen Iverson, is to be traded to the Detroit Pissed-ONs for Chauncey Billups and 'maybe' Antonio McDyess! McDyess is in question, but the trades are in full effect. Can't see the logic in this one, but it struck my attention.
-
Just saw the latest polls. They're not closing anymore, but widening. I think McCain doing SNL last night was a big mistake, as some might take that as him not worrying about the economy as much as 'people think he should be'. I donno, but the polls are widening: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/us/general_election_mccain_vs_obama-225.html
-
Thanks man, but I think you and some of the guys in my clan are missing the point. UnderTow and Sniper have copies of all the files of the Website that we worked on, so I'm just waiting for them to have time to finish with their own things. Their launch of the wonderful 'Ravenfall' site, plus getting these Tournaments under way, are way more important than my PS3 Theme, which we can release 'any time'. It's practically already done, and I'm happy with our private files that we will be using in it. I have no intention of releasing those fiiles to anyone but us 3, as it is more of an 'IN HOUSE' thing. So there is 'No need'...but again...thanks bro!
-
Hey! Nice SIG! ~ Um, my cenario was a classroom where the L/R/A/K is playing with the schoolrooms toys. He shouldn't feel bad that the teacher is making them share, because he probably has 20 toys 'just like it at home'. Sorry that I did not proofread myself, I just thought it was a good point that YOU made...as to how it's not Obama sharing but 'more like' the teacher equalizing the class. I am just trying to elaborate/modify on YOUR example, saying that the L/R/A/K is used to having much, and should not mind sharing. Please don't read too much into that example...
-
-
If you guys haven't figured it out yet, I am a very reasonable guy. 'STREETSWEEPR1': That is a PERFECT example of what they are saying that Obama is doing! Its true: He's not the kid who is sharing...he's the TEACHER taking the damn toy from the little RICH ASS kid, and letting the less fortunate one play with that toy! ~ LMAO But 'seriously', you have to understand that the little RICH ASS kid, probably is the bully in the room and has ALL THE TOYS to begin with! 'That', is probably why the teacher went over to his corner and took 'just one' of the toys away. the little R/A/K, won't even care, because he probably has 20 other toys around him!
-
Ok, I'm just going to take a portion of this and tell you what I think. Obama did not invent redistribution. Redistribution has always been the way the Government balances things. But they've been doing it from the Top to the Bottom, and somehow, it never trickles down far enough. Obama wants to try it where it is deserved the MOST, with the Middle-Class. Without the M/C, nothing gets done. If you reward the M/C, they take their money and they BUY THINGS. They buy Cars, Houses, things that the big Corporations manufacture. When they 'buy things', it is an incentive for the economy. It pays the Big Corporations...and they hire to make MORE THINGS for us to BUY. All in a nutshell! I 'do' see things from your point of view. It's just that in seeing things done this way, I cannot see 'why' we have the highest unemployment rate, jobs still laying off and etc. It just 'seems' that if the way things are NOW, these issues would not be here. BUT THEY ARE HERE, AND THE WORST THAT IT HAS BEEN IN A LONG TIME! So I have realized that, if things are bad from following this current method of redistribution, then we should try another way of approaching it. We deserve to at least try! And I 'keep hearing' about the POOR PEOPLE? They DON'T PAY TAXES, SO OBAMA's PLAN IS 'NOT FOR THEM!' He is talking about the "working M/C", NOT Welfare! I don't see why you all keep thinking that he is giving tax cuts to the Welfare, when he 'clearly states' that it is for those 'who work' and who pay taxes. Those on 'WELFARE', do not pay any tax...so they don't get a 'tax cut'! (BTW: If I missed something about the way I am seeing things, I will amend my statements...as always)
-
There's an area in OUR Forum 'just for peoples custom-made' PS3 Themes (that I approve of). Your's has been added, so they will be able to download it from our forum! Nice work for your first try! We now have [uF]'s, 101st's, [ThizZ] Clan's, and if other clan wants theirs listed, just PM me the Files, or the link to the files, etc. We still do not have ours, as I am still waiting for 'UnderTow' to find some time for me
-
I'm gonna keep it real: 1) I watch Fox network news, because when I want to hear news about the Presidents, they are always in McCains favor. 2) I watch 'more of' MSNBC, because Fox is so biased for McCain, that when I want to hear something positive about Obama...they give it! 3) Most of us in this forum keep saying that Obama is going to be taking 'their money'. I find this passable with maybe one or two of you guys, but if Obama says that 95% of 'WORKING' people WILL GET A TAX CUT...how is it that they are taking YOUR MONEY to give to the Middle Class? I'm just keeping it real, in the sense that almost 'everyone' in this thread is saying that Obama is going to be taking their money which means that most of you are above the $250,000.00 income bracket? I have no way of knowing what any of your incomes are. I just find that 'most of you' who say that Obama will be taking your money, is hard for me to believe. I make a 'damn good living', and I 'know' that I am not in that bracket. I'm just keepin' it real here, and those of you who know you're not in that bracket should do the same. It's 'one thing' to be upset that he will be taxing those above the bracket, but its another thing to lead us to believe that he will be taking your money because you are in that bracket. Points #1 and #2 are FACTUAL, and anyone who says that FOX is not biased...is lying. MSNBC is biased as well for Obama, and FOX is biased for McCain. Even when FOX is forced to be fair about Obama, the reporters seem to be 'pissed that they have to make that claim'. There 'are' a few exceptions for the most part of both networks, but in all reality...'IF YOU WANT TO HEAR GOOD POSITIVE THINGS ABOUT McCain, stay on FOX. The opposite applies, if you want to hear positive things about Obama. Thats just the way it is. Hannity has it 'out' for Obama, and Colmes is the most Passive person in Obamas favor, that he just needs to shut the hell up, because he does not counteract Hannity one bit!
-
Cache and browser history were cleared when I checked, but it does show the 2 points now for whatever reason. So we are in 6th place of our Divsion, even though it shows us at the 7th spot, right? Thanks SEQUOYAH
-
There is an error on the scoring, with respect to [sCK]. We have won 1 game, and lost 1, yet our score is 0...when we should have 2 pts. Thank you in Advance :'(
-
I agree with 'Bandit99' (actually, I always do! lol). This is a fine time, for us to take our 'Win with Honor, Lose with Dignity' to the next level and apply it outside of the [uF] Community. Yet, ALL I SEE is what's going to happen NEGATIVELY if/when Obama becomes President, or how McCain is NOT THINKING STRAIGHT, and etc. I stated many threads ago, that regardless of the outcome, I would support whomever is the Winner. To 'help bring together' instead of 'further divide' this country. I also said that the 'only time' that we come together as Americans, is when some Terrorist slams us up the ass because they see how divided we are in between. We need to be this way 'ALL THE TIME'. It's just like what my Gun Shooting Instructor said to me when applying for my CHL, "If most crooks 'KNEW' that the person they want to rob was ARMED, they would not try to rob 'that person!'" We need to ARM OURSELVES with Unity. We can't afford to wait for someone to come and try to rob us first. "WIN WITH HONOR, LOSE...WITH DIGNITY" ~ Regardless of 'who wins this election'!
-
The 'Re-distributor' theme song (I'm posting it because, well...it's kind of 'catchy!' lol):
-
McCain 'is' a fine man, fine example...a true LEADER. No one will or 'can' ever take that away from him. I think the 'only' reason that I am not voting for him 'this time around' is because I have witnessed this nation falter during these last 8 years. I think that the whole government needs to have their house cleaned out and put some new blood in, because of what has transpired since then. When this election for President begain, it's just funny how 'all this time', McCain has never wanted or pushed for 'change'. Obama has been about that every since the beginning. Now, I'm not here to try to change peoples minds over or anything. I'm just trying to 'explain my reasoning' whether it's good reasoning or not. You guys are teaching me to go 'beyond' looking at each elects 'character' and to look more deeply into their solutions to our problems. McCain has stood for too many things that relate to how this country has deteriorated. I watched him vote to have our jobs shipped overseas, and the results of that catastrophe (if you want an example, 'call DELL CUSTOMER SERVICE, for starters, and when the little mother fuckers from India eventually hang up on you because they 'really cannot' solve your computer issue...then you'll see why I am voting for 'CHANGE!'). McCain will ALWAYS be a great man in all of our eyes. Don't take it that we are discrediting him for what he has brought to this country. If he did not bring 'Palin' into the mix...he probably would have had more consideration. I think that his gameplan started wrong from the start. Sure, Palin jumpstarted the whole Republican party again, but she is a 'nightmare' and a person who (in my opinion), has ALWAYS HAD THE "PRESIDENCY" on her mind from the very start! Just look at how shes trying to save her own ass right now! She does not listen to 'anyone' probably even McCAIN! I remember one state (can't remember which state though), where McCain said 'We're pulling out', and that "++++++" told McCain that 'she and her husband' are still going there to campaign!' She scares me, as to what would happen, if anything (God forbid) would happen to McCain as President. It is by McCain bringing 'Palin' into this mix, that people question McCains judgement. He did 'nothiing' but 'De-regulate' in the senate, even tried to make Social Security Private, and supported Bush all this time. NOW, he says that he's changed? I just cannot give him 'that'. Everything he's said is only recently. If there was evedence in my mind of him promoting what he's selling now...I probably would have given him more consideration. A perfect example of Palin not being on point to govern this nation, is when she went to 'WEST Pennsylvania' (that is the hometown of the Pirates, NOT the Phillies!), but she congratulates 'them' (the Pirates hometown!) for winning the World Series...thinking it was Eastern PA! She just, doesn't get it! The "+++++++" just 'scares' me! lol REFERNECE(S): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NKYpZ42ATHU ~ (around 1:20 inward of the clip) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kfi8TntIuMw http://edition.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/29/palin.gop/index.html?iref=topnews
-
Oh, let me tell YOU! Obama won't get ARIZONA! I spent 4 years living there working for the Aerospace in 'Scottsdale' and 'Tempe'. They do not give MLK as a holiday/day off from work if you wanted, I actually did not experience racism until then! Got pulled over on a daily basis and left without any tickets, got shot at for giving my female neighbor a ride home, cops did not believe I was 'leadman for the nightshift ~ even though ALL the the keys worked in the doors, when I would close the factory...yep, count AZ out! I bet money on that one!
-
Oh, that Obama-mercial? KILLED IT! a.k.a. 'The Closer!': Oh, and here's a FREEBEE:
-
COULD a gaming clan be run like the US government?
CritiKiL replied to TOW-19's topic in Playstation
I miss GOAT! We've learned alot from him, and I really 'try' to make my points short...but it isn't working :-[ I have an idea. I'll 'cut the pill in half!' lol -
COULD a gaming clan be run like the US government?
CritiKiL replied to TOW-19's topic in Playstation
I voted ''no'' and I don't ever think that a clan could ever be run like the US Government. I 'do' think that the conventional manner of 'Leader/Co-Leaders' etc. are a dictatorship. So, a clan is more like a business that someone has started. This would be the President or CEO of the company, and if he had any help in 'starting the business', that person or persons would be the VP's and whatever other names you might want to give. It's easy to 'work your way up', depending on how much you know about how the business is run and in your talents, such as 'Graphics design' or administrative abilities...even good Leadership skills can move you up within the Business! Also, the way you interact with the workers, is always a PLUS. We have people who work inline with the businesses 'guidelines' (what the rules are, what you should know if you do this or that, and what you can be terminated from employment for and etc.). The guidelines allow for a voting process, but this process never is about the workers voting the owner out. That would be like authorizing a 'coo' in which any disgruntled group within the company could overthrow those who formed it. So we devise a 'Council'. Council members, are anywhere from the GFXs design team, ADMINs, Recruiters, Tournament Reps, (including the Unit Command, mentioned later). This council hears the workers issues or complaints, and many issues are moderateable or can be voted to make changes to the existing issue(s). The 'Council' subjects these issues and votes are tallied. Below the Council are the Supervisors or Unit Command, who deal directly with the workers. In 'this type of business' as with most businesses, the Unit Command 'rotate' or are voted on each term (in our case, the term is every 3 months). Council is every 6 months. Every person is chosen by recommendation. They have a 'record' established of their contributions to the business whether by game wins, recruitments, following guidelines without suspensions and etc. In 'this' cenario, even if the votes are in the workers favor, a 'reasonable' President may honor the outcome. But never is there a chance of the Business Owners position to be part of a process that the workers have control over. The President 'always' has the power of 'Executive Decision' regarding a vote outcome. The workers agree to this upon being hired or acquired. The job pays the workers by giving incentives, awards or whatever this company says it will pay out. The workers have the choice of accepting this, or looking elsewhere for another place to 'work'. -
I agree. I do pretty well for myself and went through hell to get to this point as many of you have. I have seen a situation where the rich are getting rich and the poor, are staying poor. A flat tax seems fair, but It's just like you see people on welfare with money and things that you feel they should not have, well those who are filthy rich are abusing the system in the same way! "They're NOT buying 'cable', 'HDTV's', and things like that. They're buying 'BANKS', 'ISLANDS', 'COUNTRIES'...and things that I cannot even imagine!" I would like to see 'trickledown' economics trickle, but the filthy rich have 'baskets' to keep it from running down. Do we allow 'this' to keep happening? And what harm is it, to try to get the 'breaks' to those who work the hardest? You (SQUID) said yourself that you and your wife busted 'hard' to get to your point. Is making it to a point where you are financially stable still having to pay a tax, going to kill you? NO! I basically look at it as Obama's plan, helping those who are where 'you and your wife once were' to "get to where you and your wife NOW ARE! Is 'that' so hard to understand? And I think that those on Welfare with their HDTV's and cable, etc. is NOTHING compared to the Filthy rich, who are not giving ANYTHING back! They'll STILL be paying taxes...so? Aren't they doing this now? Unemploymentat it's current rate is HIGH. It is NOT because of Obamas plan. So, why aren't the filthy rich giving out jobs? That's just my logic in how I see it. OTHERS will disagree...
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Ilwk_wmsQk Go to the 3:00 mark and watch, or just watch the whole thing. (3:18) "I just wanna make sure that they're paying a little bit more in order to pay for those other tax cuts. Wow, I heard it! Thats what he said!!!! But he 'does' mention it as a small 5%, to help out those who make up the remaining 95% of 'working' individuals. I just had a long talk with someone who seems to think that people who are on welfare and not working will get this tax cut. He explains to me, that only those who file for income tax are 'working people' right? So if you do not make over $12,000.00 a year...you cannot even file. So those who aren't working or on welfare are not going to see these Tax Cuts. If someone sees this point differently, please let me hear your thoughts. And my apologies '[iLL] Squid': I didn't think that deeply into it. You are 100% correct in that statement you made! Yea, I read what I posted, but my argument was the point that I highlighted. I posted the breakdown, because everyone is claiming that they are changing the amount. This is what it has always been. If he says $150k, $250k...I'm sure its a reference of the actual breakdown. How many times to you say that a person who has $5.84 actually has $5 or $6? I'm just making a comparison, and the breakdown should speak for itself.