Jump to content
Create New...

OBAMA OR MCCAIN WHO DO YOU CHOSE


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

RNG187 ]

can we have an admin lock this thread' date=' PLEASE? this went from debate, to pissing contest to, "you're a girl, and MY candidate's better" ... " you're a BITCH and you're LYING"

[/quote']

 

Censorhip? Silence those who exercise their right to free speech? Someone say something you don't like, time to shut them up?

 

This was never a debate. I got involved when someone made a post about his beliefs and got dog piled by those who didn't agree with him. Trying to silence him.

 

I'm strong and knowledable enough not to be silenced. I've said more than once, "got dirt on McCain, then post it". The dirt was never delivered. Why? Maybe there isn't any? Keating 5? John Glenn who endorsed and campaigned for Obama was part of the Keating 5. The Keating 5 had five politicans involved, 3 Democrats and 2 Republicans, and only one politican testified at Keating's trial, John McCain. And Keating served prison time.

 

Instead there is only accusations of 12 different types against me on a personal level. Also threats of death against those in Florida who don't vote Obama.

 

Thanks for making my whole point. Shut them up. They don't deserve to be heard.

 

Welcome to the new Democratic Party. Take what we give you and be grateful for what we don't take from you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no, not b/c of the fact that i dont like some of the things you're saying, bc if that were the case i would've made a bigger deal, earlier. i'd like to see this shut down b/c of the personal comments being made b/c its total bullshit on BOTH sides. yeah, you have the right to free speech and i respect that, totally and completely until it starts crossing lines. i'll say this and back it up, you didnt throw the first stone in terms of getting personal, piglet did. but that doesnt make what you say, right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Bullshit" on both sides" ?

 

Sorry RNG, I'm going to challenge you on that.

 

Please, quote any "bullshit" I have posted, the thread is over 50 pages long, I'm a major contributer as to why it's 50 pages long, so this shouldn't be hard if I've been posting "bullshit".

 

Quote and post any "bullshit" I have posted, back it up with verifiable independent news sources and let the chips fall where they may.

 

I think you are fishing in a empty well RNG, it's time you proved me wrong. I'm not just talking out my ass like some people who will remain un-named, and I'm about to prove it.

 

Your move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LMAO.... that's rich. Coming from someone who has used Kieth Olberman as a source in this thread. Sorry pal, but you lost all credibility to question ANYONE'S news sources once you did that. Go back into your corner crying about how the last two elections were stolen from you and tonite "uncle" Kieth will come on T.V. and confirm to you that it's absolutely true.

 

the latest one b/c i'm just being lazy right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RNG187 ]
LMAO.... that's rich. Coming from someone who has used Kieth Olberman as a source in this thread. Sorry pal' date=' but you lost all credibility to question ANYONE'S news sources once you did that. Go back into your corner crying about how the last two elections were stolen from you and tonite "uncle" Kieth will come on T.V. and confirm to you that it's absolutely true.

[/quote']

 

the latest one b/c i'm just being lazy right now.

 

That's it? Keith Olbermann who went on a 10 minute rant on NATIONAL CABLE NEW telling Hilllary Clinton to get out of the Democratic Race? Olbermann who is a ardent Obama supporter? Olbermann who posts on DailyKos freqeuntly? The same Olbermann who was fired from covering election night coverage because his convention coverage was too biased, NOT MY WORDS, the words of his bosses at NBC.

 

Come on man... at least make it hard. Olbermann is a hack. Using Olbermann as a reference is like me using Rush Limbaugh as a reference, WHICH I HAVE NEVER DONE. It's all an act, just to generate advertising dollars like OReilly and Hannity does, just like all cable news commentary shows do.

 

If that is your definition of "bullshit", then I need to go back and call a lot of "bullshit" on numerous posts.

 

Didn't you see the part where I said "independent and verifiable new sources" ?

 

Olbermann is not a news source. Olbermann is an act to make money.

 

PLUS, I never posted anything from Olbermann. I never used Olbermann as a source. I laughed at Olbermann being used as a source.

 

Big difference.

 

Strike One on the bullshit O'Meter.

 

Olbermann is bullshit, but I didn't throw that pitch, someone else did. Look for a bullshit pitch I threw.

 

Good luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

dude, i didnt say it was the best or anything. but you're a man who speaks about getting news from neutral sources, yet you post links from foxnews who is a right wing news station. i understand, know and agree w/your points on keith olberman but dude, you cant sit and rip people for using questionable news sources, then go and use one yourself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well to get BACK on to the original topic I choose McCain now. Funny thing is if you asked me a month ago I would've said probably Obama. But I now choose McCain for the simple and selfish strategy "what can this candidate do for me"? I don't like the fact Barack wants to take what little money I have and give it to someone else who won't go bust their ass for a tiny wage like me. You know what fuck that guy. I hope he starves, I want no part of helping him. Yeah I know there are some good people on unemployment my neighbor being one of them. But with this economy in shambles he can't get a job. His area is managing car dealerships and repair centers but nobody is buying right now. With Obama's planned tax on business owners making over $250,000 or $200,000 or whatever it is that is just gonna screw me over worse. Last week I sat down at a bar with some of my teammates on my men's league team for hockey, most of them are small business owners. Its interesting to hear things from their side. You have the guy making $200,000 next to the guy making $20,000(me :'() a year. They told me straight up if that tax goes through the first people to feel it will be the guys at the bottom of the totem pole like me. My pay gets cut way before theirs will. I already make shit I can't afford to make less so its McCain for me.

 

Not to mention the fact that the guy is a vet who was in a fuckin pow camp. You think this guy doesn't mean business? I trust him in a wartime situation way over Obama period. Someone please give me one reason why I should vote for Obama. What can he do for Jake the Zamboni driver?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe im being bias but I dont look at FoxNews as a biased network. Now their Commentary shows are Conservative viewpoints, but their pretty open about it. Chris Wallace,Sheppard Smith,Brit Hume,Neil Cavuto,etc. are the news programs. What is biased about these shows? Of course O'Reilly & Hannity are their OPINION shows. Do you have proof that Fox's NEWS shows are biased or do you just follow the Democrat talking point?

 

Have you ever even watched that evil Fox News?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ARAS_ScoField ]

Maybe im being bias but I dont look at FoxNews as a biased network. Now their Commentary shows are Conservative viewpoints, but their pretty open about it. Chris Wallace,Sheppard Smith,Brit Hume,Neil Cavuto,etc. are the news programs. What is biased about these shows? Of course O'Reilly & Hannity are their OPINION shows. Do you have proof that Fox's NEWS shows are biased or do you just follow the Democrat talking point?

 

Have you ever even watched that evil Fox News?

 

 

Thank you. There's a pew poll out, I can't find it on the internet, but it states on positive and negative stories on each Presidential candidate:

 

Fox news is 40% negative stories and 40% positive stories on BOTH candidates.

 

MSNBC is 60% negative and 30% positive about McCain. 74% positive and 14% negative about Obama.

 

Plus, I'm not talking about a whole network. I'm talking about a "commentater" that talked down to and lectured Hillary Clinton for almost 10 minutes on national TV and the purpose of the "lecture" was to tell Clinton to drop out of the race to make room for Obama. Here's the video, if you can say that Olbermann is a serious news reporter after watching this, then we can just agree to disagree (be sure to watch all of it, there are some real pearls in there):

 

 

Look as long as you like, but you will never find such a bias on ANY OTHER NEWS NETWORK in the United States. If you are getting your news from Olbermann, you are getting your news from a far left wing fanatic. Maddow isn't much better, and Chris Matthews is the guy with the "thrill" up his leg when he hears Obama speak.

 

Here's a couple more video's showing just how far Olbermann is in the tank for Obama for good measure:

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i5fydONgwA8

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0air5vu1d9o

 

And my personal favorite, after numerous softball interviews Olbermann has given to Obama, Olbermann has the gall to criticize someone else for giving Palin a softball interview:

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l7vXwxU_6rQ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm gonna keep it real:

 

1) I watch Fox network news, because when I want to hear news about the Presidents, they are always in McCains favor.

2) I watch 'more of' MSNBC, because Fox is so biased for McCain, that when I want to hear something positive about Obama...they give it!

3) Most of us in this forum keep saying that Obama is going to be taking 'their money'. I find this passable with maybe one or two of you guys, but if Obama says that 95% of 'WORKING' people WILL GET A TAX CUT...how is it that they are taking YOUR MONEY to give to the Middle Class? I'm just keeping it real, in the sense that almost 'everyone' in this thread is saying that Obama is going to be taking their money which means that most of you are above the $250,000.00 income bracket?

 

I have no way of knowing what any of your incomes are. I just find that 'most of you' who say that Obama will be taking your money, is hard for me to believe. I make a 'damn good living', and I 'know' that I am not in that bracket. I'm just keepin' it real here, and those of you who know you're not in that bracket should do the same. It's 'one thing' to be upset that he will be taxing those above the bracket, but its another thing to lead us to believe that he will be taking your money because you are in that bracket.

 

Points #1 and #2 are FACTUAL, and anyone who says that FOX is not biased...is lying. MSNBC is biased as well for Obama, and FOX is biased for McCain. Even when FOX is forced to be fair about Obama, the reporters seem to be 'pissed that they have to make that claim'. There 'are' a few exceptions for the most part of both networks, but in all reality...'IF YOU WANT TO HEAR GOOD POSITIVE THINGS ABOUT McCain, stay on FOX. The opposite applies, if you want to hear positive things about Obama. Thats just the way it is. Hannity has it 'out' for Obama, and Colmes is the most Passive person in Obamas favor, that he just needs to shut the hell up, because he does not counteract Hannity one bit!

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Criticil I will ask you ONE question.

 

Who provides the jobs in this country?

 

Is it the 95% of people or the 5% of the people that are already paying a majority of the taxes already? Will those companies stay here and create more jobs or go across seas where it is cheaper? Or even scale back to still make margins. It is Economics 101, raise the taxes, take more money out of the companies pockets they are less willing to give it to their workers. In essence you are taking the money right out of their hands.

 

How does that make ANY sense?

 

Barrack Obamas plan is a SOCIALIST plan. If you are not sure what socialism is go look at Wikipedia. It is wealth redistribution. The government takes control of private sectors and decides if you are making too much money and redistributes it for you. Obama has set that limit at $250,000. An amount that is not even very good for a small business. Obama claims that most small businesses don't make that much. BS! Successful small businesses may make that much or just over. You take that money out of their pockets how do they improve? How do they pay their employees and keep moving forward? They can't! No one will want to take the risk to move forward just because the Government is keeping them down, just o make everyone EVEN.

 

Like I said before the taxes and redistribution of wealth won't bring poor people up but bring the working class people and the Small Business Owners DOWN to their level. In a nutshell that is Obama's plan.

 

I have asked before, when in our nations history has Taxing people MORE boosted our economy. NEVER it has never happened EVER. Taxes only helped the budget.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CDBS14 ]

i am pretty sure the general' date=' and i mean like more of an overgeneralization of socialism is wealth re-distribution. there is more to socialism than that.

[/quote']

 

Yes your right. That is why I talked about government control of the private sector. It was not an over generalization.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

obama says we will call hima socialist/comunist becuz he shared his toys in kindergarted which is not true..

 

now if the teachers come and takes your toy so someone else can play with it now that is what obama wants...that is socialism/communism thought right their

 

as for locking the thread you know that wont happen this is a healthy debate /arguement ......YOU CANT DO LIKE OBAMA AND SHUT IT DOWN CUZ YOU DONT LIKE IT????..BUT YOU CAN AVOID THIS TOPIC IF YOU LIKE AND WE WONT SAY ANYTHING.....

 

THE TRUTH HURTS ASD IT IS HURTING OBAMA NOW.....GO JOHNNY MAC GO

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CDBS14 ]

wow you guys didnt even share your toys in pre-k' date=' idk about you guys but why so isolated and egocentric? why me, me, me , me? remeber there is no I in team ;)

 

 

[/quote']I could vote for myself and go on welfare i am not wealthy at all.....matter of fact i have nothing i am worth 2 dollars and 67 cents --behind on my rent 1850--two months--..i ran out of oil last nite (live in new hamshire)very cold this morning...have no money to get oil...got a baby a girlfriend ..car need to be registerd this week..you know i could go on forever...i am voting for the military not me.........my neghbor just got oil from the state ..they got two cars, three computers internet and all that shit ....then they order dominos every night this week....bullshit....they are voting obama....

 

my point is i will work for what i need 2 live-- i will disconnect my internet or sell my 99 jeep - before making you pay for my living

 

and cdbs i know you wernt singleing me out i just happen to be the first nuckle head to read and post.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i understand, as a matter of fact i see it daily. I live in a neighborhood with many eastern europeans and jews. Many of them came to the US after the cold war and under political asylum, to this day they live on welfare and well their kids ride year new mercedes, lexus, BMW and it is kind of annoying seeing that crap. i think the welfare system is good in theory but it needs more regulation and enforcement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CDBS14 ]

i understand' date=' as a matter of fact i see it daily. I live in a neighborhood with many eastern europeans and jews. Many of them came to the US after the cold war and under political asylum, to this day they live on welfare and well their kids ride year new mercedes, lexus, BMW and it is kind of annoying seeing that crap. i think the welfare system is good in theory but it needs more regulation and enforcement.

[/quote']yes sir ...should be a time limit or some shit.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Red0ctobeR ]

Criticil I will ask you ONE question.

 

Who provides the jobs in this country?

 

Is it the 95% of people or the 5% of the people that are already paying a majority of the taxes already? Will those companies stay here and create more jobs or go across seas where it is cheaper? Or even scale back to still make margins. It is Economics 101, raise the taxes, take more money out of the companies pockets they are less willing to give it to their workers. In essence you are taking the money right out of their hands.

 

How does that make ANY sense?

 

Barrack Obamas plan is a SOCIALIST plan. If you are not sure what socialism is go look at Wikipedia. It is wealth redistribution. The government takes control of private sectors and decides if you are making too much money and redistributes it for you. Obama has set that limit at $250,000. An amount that is not even very good for a small business. Obama claims that most small businesses don't make that much. BS! Successful small businesses may make that much or just over. You take that money out of their pockets how do they improve? How do they pay their employees and keep moving forward? They can't! No one will want to take the risk to move forward just because the Government is keeping them down, just o make everyone EVEN.

 

Like I said before the taxes and redistribution of wealth won't bring poor people up but bring the working class people and the Small Business Owners DOWN to their level. In a nutshell that is Obama's plan.

 

I have asked before, when in our nations history has Taxing people MORE boosted our economy. NEVER it has never happened EVER. Taxes only helped the budget.

Ok, I'm just going to take a portion of this and tell you what I think. Obama did not invent redistribution. Redistribution has always been the way the Government balances things. But they've been doing it from the Top to the Bottom, and somehow, it never trickles down far enough. Obama wants to try it where it is deserved the MOST, with the Middle-Class. Without the M/C, nothing gets done. If you reward the M/C, they take their money and they BUY THINGS. They buy Cars, Houses, things that the big Corporations manufacture. When they 'buy things', it is an incentive for the economy. It pays the Big Corporations...and they hire to make MORE THINGS for us to BUY. All in a nutshell!

 

I 'do' see things from your point of view. It's just that in seeing things done this way, I cannot see 'why' we have the highest unemployment rate, jobs still laying off and etc. It just 'seems' that if the way things are NOW, these issues would not be here. BUT THEY ARE HERE, AND THE WORST THAT IT HAS BEEN IN A LONG TIME! So I have realized that, if things are bad from following this current method of redistribution, then we should try another way of approaching it. We deserve to at least try!

 

And I 'keep hearing' about the POOR PEOPLE? They DON'T PAY TAXES, SO OBAMA's PLAN IS 'NOT FOR THEM!' He is talking about the "working M/C", NOT Welfare! I don't see why you all keep thinking that he is giving tax cuts to the Welfare, when he 'clearly states' that it is for those 'who work' and who pay taxes. Those on 'WELFARE', do not pay any tax...so they don't get a 'tax cut'! (BTW: If I missed something about the way I am seeing things, I will amend my statements...as always)

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

obama says we will call hima socialist/comunist becuz he shared his toys in kindergarted which is not true..

 

now if the teachers come and takes your toy so someone else can play with it now that is what obama wants...that is socialism/communism thought right their

If you guys haven't figured it out yet, I am a very reasonable guy. 'STREETSWEEPR1': That is a PERFECT example of what they are saying that Obama is doing! Its true: He's not the kid who is sharing...he's the TEACHER taking the damn toy from the little RICH ASS kid, and letting the less fortunate one play with that toy! ~ LMAO

 

But 'seriously', you have to understand that the little RICH ASS kid, probably is the bully in the room and has ALL THE TOYS to begin with! 'That', is probably why the teacher went over to his corner and took 'just one' of the toys away. the little R/A/K, won't even care, because he probably has 20 other toys around him! :-*

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CritiKiL, a.k.a. GOAT Jr. ]
Red0ctobeR ]

Criticil I will ask you ONE question.

 

Who provides the jobs in this country?

 

Is it the 95% of people or the 5% of the people that are already paying a majority of the taxes already? Will those companies stay here and create more jobs or go across seas where it is cheaper? Or even scale back to still make margins. It is Economics 101, raise the taxes, take more money out of the companies pockets they are less willing to give it to their workers. In essence you are taking the money right out of their hands.

 

How does that make ANY sense?

 

Barrack Obamas plan is a SOCIALIST plan. If you are not sure what socialism is go look at Wikipedia. It is wealth redistribution. The government takes control of private sectors and decides if you are making too much money and redistributes it for you. Obama has set that limit at $250,000. An amount that is not even very good for a small business. Obama claims that most small businesses don't make that much. BS! Successful small businesses may make that much or just over. You take that money out of their pockets how do they improve? How do they pay their employees and keep moving forward? They can't! No one will want to take the risk to move forward just because the Government is keeping them down, just o make everyone EVEN.

 

Like I said before the taxes and redistribution of wealth won't bring poor people up but bring the working class people and the Small Business Owners DOWN to their level. In a nutshell that is Obama's plan.

 

I have asked before, when in our nations history has Taxing people MORE boosted our economy. NEVER it has never happened EVER. Taxes only helped the budget.

Ok, I'm just going to take a portion of this and tell you what I think. Obama did not invent redistribution. Redistribution has always been the way the Government balances things. But they've been doing it from the Top to the Bottom, and somehow, it never trickles down far enough. Obama wants to try it where it is deserved the MOST, with the Middle-Class. Without the M/C, nothing gets done. If you reward the M/C, they take their money and they BUY THINGS. They buy Cars, Houses, things that the big Corporations manufacture. When they 'buy things', it is an incentive for the economy. It pays the Big Corporations...and they hire to make MORE THINGS for us to BUY. All in a nutshell!

 

I 'do' see things from your point of view. It's just that in seeing things done this way, I cannot see 'why' we have the highest unemployment rate, jobs still laying off and etc. It just 'seems' that if the way things are NOW, these issues would not be here. BUT THEY ARE HERE, AND THE WORST THAT IT HAS BEEN IN A LONG TIME! So I have realized that, if things are bad from following this current method of redistribution, then we should try another way of approaching it. We deserve to at least try!

 

And I 'keep hearing' about the POOR PEOPLE? They DON'T PAY TAXES, SO OBAMA's PLAN IS 'NOT FOR THEM!' He is talking about the "working M/C", NOT Welfare! I don't see why you all keep thinking that he is giving tax cuts to the Welfare, when he 'clearly states' that it is for those 'who work' and who pay taxes. Those on 'WELFARE', do not pay any tax...so they don't get a 'tax cut'! (BTW: If I missed something about the way I am seeing things, I will amend my statements...as always)

 

 

 

 

obama will only give you maybe 700 dollars more on the tax break then mccain....700 dollars if you are willing to risk your freedom and millitary power and funding for 700 bucks then WOW....

 

obama want to raise taxes on the company's that suply products that run this country products for the middle class ...what will happen then. the big companys will not take the loss out of thier pockets.they will raise the products price they will cut jobs to make up the loss...

 

now on the flip side if you give them a little tax break then they can create jobs and lower prices on their products and boom economy back up and you are saving more while spnding more.....

 

you have to look at more then the economy it will fix itself regaurdless...SHIT bush might even be making the right moves to do it right now.....the man still gets no credit just blam ...when in fact all these loans are from the clinton admin when they wanted equal housing and everybody deserves a house shit. when they couldnt afford them .we need to work with the morgage people so people can have a lower rent on their house till they get back on thier feet ...WE NEED REFORM

KEEP AMERICA-- AMERICA-- i would help you on my own FREE WILL not because obama is goin to force it upon us to a far greater extent....(sorry post was way longer then i intended) :P

 

in a nut shell vote for your safety becuase if you get attcked then the economy doesnt mean shit when your dead..nor education -nor healthcare ...we are at war with terrorist.....please dont cut the troops supply and funding...you mine as well give them the same shit the terroriat got ford and honda instaed of hummers and tanks........

 

 

 

 

ALL IN GOOD LUCK TO EVERY ONE TUESDAY AND MAY WE ALL BE SOCOM FRIENDS THE DAY BEFORE -DAY OF- AND THE DAY AFTER

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CritiKiL, a.k.a. GOAT Jr. ]

obama says we will call hima socialist/comunist becuz he shared his toys in kindergarted which is not true..

 

now if the teachers come and takes your toy so someone else can play with it now that is what obama wants...that is socialism/communism thought right their

If you guys haven't figured it out yet, I am a very reasonable guy. 'STREETSWEEPR1': That is a PERFECT example of what they are saying that Obama is doing! Its true: He's not the kid who is sharing...he's the TEACHER taking the damn toy from the little RICH ASS kid, and letting the less fortunate one play with that toy! ~ LMAO

 

But 'seriously', you have to understand that the little RICH ASS kid, probably is the bully in the room and has ALL THE TOYS to begin with! 'That', is probably why the teacher went over to his corner and took 'just one' of the toys away. the little R/A/K, won't even care, because he probably has 20 other toys around him! :-*

 

 

WOW tha is how you see it...cool i guess.......then when does it stop...first rich was 250k ..now 200k...(he lied) biden says 150k (they lock him up),,richardson says 120k...when does it stop?

 

who are they to say you cant play with the toy your family worked so hard for you to have ..you have to give it to the kid who's family is on welfare but buying pizza ,goin out to eat,arguing on the internet watching cable .......it shouldnt be our fault nor responsibility to care for the family that is not taking care of their priority yet abusing the system.....makes me sad becaus ei myself and many like me could use help right now but choose not too becuse thier is poeple out their that do actually need help and i feel i am taking away from them.....but makibng the system more accesable and larger by taking from the military is not the answer...reform and regulation will...........

 

spreading the wealth is not my issue i could care less my issue is the man. has lied too you all and you choose to put it aside like it doesnt matter..he is hiding too much.....and we are gonna get an all one sided democrat government ......we need checks and balances

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Military including Active, Reserve, Veteran and Dependents get 50% off of our Spec Ops Premium Experience

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By visiting this site you agree to our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search